H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Jarry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2025 Generali Open third round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025* | Generali Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |