H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Rafael Jodar holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rafael Jodar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Jodar won the 2026 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Jodar | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Oct 14, 2026 | R16 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #41 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 127 | 126 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rafael Jodar | #13 | #11 | 2,671 | 2,002 | 41 | 16 | 71.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Rafael Jodar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #13 | 1,979 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #41 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Rafael Jodar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1979 | 156.9 | +0.26 | +4.87 | 1.145 | 52.5% | -79 | -63 | -341 | 61.8% | +0.90 | 17–4 (81%) | 7–12 (37%) | 110.3 | -0.02 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1865 | 149.1 | -1.13 | +2.52 | 1.032 | 50.8% | +24 | -159 | -224 | 56.0% | +0.25 | 7–10 (41%) | 21–11 (66%) | 103.6 | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1933 | 149.2 | -0.95 | +1.98 | 1.003 | 50.0% | +6 | -67 | -106 | 49.2% | -0.06 | 41–40 (51%) | 67–54 (55%) | 106.5 | -2.44 | — | 2003 | 151.4 | +0.26 | +4.87 | 1.145 | 52.5% | -79 | -63 | -341 | 61.8% | +0.90 | 17–4 (81%) | 7–12 (37%) | 110.3 | -0.04 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Tabilo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Arthur Fils | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Jiri Lehecka | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Denis Shapovalov | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 15, 2026 | H2H |
| Lorenzo Musetti | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 6, 2026 | H2H |