H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:32 UTC

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 2-1

Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2025 Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Botic van de Zandschulp
Netherlands Age 30 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 3, 2025* Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #148 4-6 7-5 6-1 Botic van de Zandschulp #88 Match data
Jul 3, 2022* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Botic van de Zandschulp #75 7-5 2-6 7-6(7) 6-1 Richard Gasquet #318 Match data
Jan 20, 2022* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Botic van de Zandschulp #57 4-6 6-0 4-0 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Botic van de Zandschulp #55 #22 1,573 1,932 114 118 49.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4
21 — — — — — — — 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5
22 — — — — — — — 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6
25 2021 15–10 60.0% #57 1,856 0 0 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6
26 2022 34–28 54.8% #35 1,835 0 0 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7
27 2023 20–24 45.5% #50 1,793 0 0 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2024 14–22 38.9% #80 1,779 0 0 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10
29 2025 16–20 44.4% #77 1,714 0 0 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12
30 2026 15–14 51.7% #55 1,713 0 0 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16