H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 2-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–0 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2025 BMW Open by Bitpanda third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025* | BMW Open by Bitpanda | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2023* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |