H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:17 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Stan Wawrinka H2H: 0-1
Stan Wawrinka holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stan Wawrinka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2025 Vanda Pharmaceuticals Hellenic Championship third round 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2025* | Vanda Pharmaceuticals Hellenic Championship | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Stan Wawrinka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 |