H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0

Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2022 Qatar Open first round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Botic van de Zandschulp
Netherlands Age 30 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Botic van de Zandschulp #50 6-2 7-6(5) Thomas Fabbiano #192 Match data Feb 16, 2022* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Botic van de Zandschulp #70 #22 1,573 1,933 120 122 49.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2021 15–10 60.0% #57 1,854 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2022 34–28 54.8% #35 1,836 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2023 20–24 45.5% #50 1,792 0 0 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2024 14–22 38.9% #80 1,778 0 0 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2025 16–20 44.4% #77 1,715 0 0 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2026 21–18 53.8% #70 1,767 0 0 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2021 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 18 17 35 51.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2023 15 15 30 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2025 10 13 23 43.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2026 12 9 21 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 76 152 50.0% 32 32 64 50.0% 12 14 26 46.2% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2021 25/25 7.0 4.4 62.4% 75.0% 49.1% 62.9% 32.0% 65.1% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 62/62 6.5 3.9 63.4% 71.7% 49.1% 59.5% 43.9% 63.1% 38.8% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2023 44/44 5.7 3.6 62.8% 69.5% 47.5% 58.2% 36.3% 61.1% 38.0% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2024 36/36 4.7 3.9 60.9% 69.3% 43.7% 60.4% 41.8% 59.3% 36.8% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2025 35/36 5.6 4.8 60.9% 73.1% 47.4% 52.3% 41.4% 63.1% 37.5% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2026 39/40 6.8 4.8 62.0% 73.3% 45.7% 64.1% 46.5% 62.9% 38.8% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
Career — 241/243 6.1 4.2 62.2% 71.7% 47.2% 59.5% 41.0% 62.3% 37.8% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Botic van de Zandschulp Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1516 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2018 1492 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2020 1480 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2021 1855 136.1 +1.69 +0.20 1.015 50.0% -21 — — 53.2% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.41 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2022 1836 154.1 +0.18 +2.55 1.051 50.8% -34 -42 -60 52.7% +0.19 9–8 (53%) 16–9 (64%) — -1.63 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2023 1793 143.4 -2.02 +2.12 0.976 49.5% +31 -62 -91 44.6% -0.30 10–7 (59%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.41 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2024 1779 143.2 -3.37 +1.62 0.904 48.2% +15 -55 -84 38.8% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.47 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2025 1715 142.0 -0.75 +1.66 1.018 50.0% +27 -14 — 45.7% -0.22 6–8 (43%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.80 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2026 1767 145.3 -1.13 +2.61 1.048 51.1% +45 -62 -126 55.0% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.28 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1933 148.6 -0.94 +1.97 1.004 50.0% +8 -47 -84 48.7% -0.07 38–38 (50%) 61–53 (54%) 105.1 -2.55 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.