H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp vs Yoshihito Nishioka H2H: 1-0
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Yoshihito Nishioka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 St. Petersburg third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2021* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-2 6-2 | Yoshihito Nishioka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yoshihito Nishioka | #177 | #24 | 1,351 | 1,931 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Botic van de Zandschulp | Yoshihito Nishioka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #166 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #73 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #56 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #36 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #69 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #110 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |