H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brad Drewett vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-1
Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Brad Drewett in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1985 Bastad third round 6-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1985* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-7 7-5 6-3 | Brad Drewett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Drewett | #1,018 | #34 | 170 | 1,763 | 181 | 225 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Drewett | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #187 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #133 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #133 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #75 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #163 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #99 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #151 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #583 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |