H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Brad Gilbert vs B. Scanlon H2H: 2-2
Brad Gilbert and B. Scanlon are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, B. Scanlon won the 1987 Chicago fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1987* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | B. Scanlon | 7-5 6-4 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1984* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | B. Scanlon | 6-4 6-1 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1984* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Brad Gilbert | 6-0 7-6 | B. Scanlon | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1984* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Brad Gilbert | 6-4 6-2 | B. Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| B. Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Gilbert | B. Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |