H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Brad Gilbert vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 0-2
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Brad Gilbert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 2-6 5-7 7-5 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 2-6 5-7 7-5 6-2 6-1 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| May 29, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Gilbert | Cedric Pioline | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 |