H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Brad Gilbert vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 1-1

Brad Gilbert and Francisco Gonzalez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on clay, while Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Gonzalez won the 1982 Japan Open round of 16 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brad Gilbert
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Francisco Gonzalez 7-6 6-2 Brad Gilbert #86 Match data Oct 22, 1982* R16 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay
Brad Gilbert 4-6 6-3 6-1 Francisco Gonzalez Match data Feb 17, 1982* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brad Gilbert #1,263 #4 1,786 2,056 506 276 64.7% 0 0 0 1 19 20
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brad Gilbert Francisco Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0
20 1982 19–13 59.4% #54 1,711 0 1 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0
21 1983 33–27 55.0% #62 1,755 0 1 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0
22 1984 39–23 62.9% #23 1,849 0 3 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0
23 1985 53–22 70.7% #18 1,893 0 6 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0
24 1986 45–14 76.3% #11 2,010 0 10 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0
25 1987 55–23 70.5% #13 1,960 0 11 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0
26 1988 30–15 66.7% #21 1,892 0 12 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0
27 1989 58–17 77.3% #6 1,989 0 17 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0
28 1990 46–19 70.8% #10 1,956 0 20 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0
29 1991 34–21 61.8% #19 1,854 0 20 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0
30 1992 39–26 60.0% #26 1,762 0 20 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0
31 1993 31–26 54.4% #35 1,736 0 20 — — — — — — —
32 1994 18–20 47.4% #76 1,622 0 20 — — — — — — —
33 1995 1–5 16.7% #680 1,560 0 20 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brad Gilbert Francisco Gonzalez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 15 14 29 51.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1984 19 9 28 67.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1985 32 9 41 78.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1986 30 7 37 81.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1987 41 11 52 78.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1989 40 8 48 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1990 25 10 35 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1991 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 1992 25 16 41 61.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1993 23 17 40 57.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 16 14 30 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 321 149 470 68.3% 36 35 71 50.7% 30 21 51 58.8% 119 71 190 62.6% — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brad Gilbert Francisco Gonzalez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1539 115.9 — — — — +37 +3 — 54.2% +0.29 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.40 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
20 1982 1711 128.9 — — — — +36 -166 — 53.2% +0.34 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) — +3.49 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16
21 1983 1755 139.6 — — — — +45 -180 -152 55.0% +0.35 8–12 (40%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.52 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31
22 1984 1850 149.5 — — — — +41 -238 -166 58.2% +0.68 12–6 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.44 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22
23 1985 1893 156.7 — — — — +64 -196 -244 66.9% +1.09 9–4 (69%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.39 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49
24 1986 2010 155.6 — — — — +53 — -304 71.3% +1.25 8–8 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.05 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51
25 1987 1960 156.6 — — — — +62 -306 -271 65.2% +0.99 13–9 (59%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.22 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46
26 1988 1892 149.8 — — — — +48 -233 — 65.5% +1.01 4–8 (33%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.11 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29
27 1989 1989 161.9 — — — — +43 -294 — 70.1% +1.11 17–11 (61%) 21–9 (70%) — -2.28 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17
28 1990 1957 155.8 — — — — +31 -248 -181 63.5% +0.96 14–6 (70%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.79 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36
29 1991 1854 152.6 +2.35 +2.76 1.137 52.4% +49 — -81 58.9% +0.67 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.61 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77
30 1992 1763 144.3 +0.88 +2.28 1.085 51.6% +29 — +50 58.1% +0.60 14–13 (52%) 14–14 (50%) — +1.15 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28
31 1993 1737 137.0 -0.17 +0.74 0.967 49.4% 0 -90 +31 49.0% -0.10 19–9 (68%) 19–8 (70%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1994 1622 133.2 -2.08 +0.66 0.943 49.2% +29 +12 — 46.7% -0.14 6–4 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1995 1561 107.9 -3.03 -2.86 0.745 45.4% +30 — — 20.0% -1.73 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2057 155.0 +0.41 +1.60 1.031 50.7% +42 -188 -127 60.6% +0.70 144–109 (57%) 144–106 (58%) 102.4 +0.46 — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.