H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Brad Gilbert vs Kim Warwick H2H: 1-1

Brad Gilbert and Kim Warwick are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1983 US Open round of 128 2-6 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brad Gilbert
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 2-6 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-1 Brad Gilbert #77 Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Brad Gilbert #75 6-1 (ret.) Kim Warwick #42 Match data Nov 12, 1982* R16 Taipei ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brad Gilbert #1,263 #4 1,786 2,056 506 276 64.7% 0 0 0 1 19 20
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brad Gilbert Kim Warwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0
19 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0
20 1982 19–13 59.4% #54 1,711 0 1 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0
21 1983 33–27 55.0% #62 1,755 0 1 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0
22 1984 39–23 62.9% #23 1,849 0 3 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0
23 1985 53–22 70.7% #18 1,893 0 6 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0
24 1986 45–14 76.3% #11 2,010 0 10 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1
25 1987 55–23 70.5% #13 1,960 0 11 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1
26 1988 30–15 66.7% #21 1,892 0 12 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1
27 1989 58–17 77.3% #6 1,989 0 17 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2
28 1990 46–19 70.8% #10 1,956 0 20 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3
29 1991 34–21 61.8% #19 1,854 0 20 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3
30 1992 39–26 60.0% #26 1,762 0 20 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3
31 1993 31–26 54.4% #35 1,736 0 20 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 1994 18–20 47.4% #76 1,622 0 20 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 1995 1–5 16.7% #680 1,560 0 20 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brad Gilbert Kim Warwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
19 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
20 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
21 1983 15 14 29 51.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 19 9 28 67.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1985 32 9 41 78.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9%
24 1986 30 7 37 81.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2%
25 1987 41 11 52 78.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1988 20 9 29 69.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1989 40 8 48 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1990 25 10 35 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 1991 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 1992 25 16 41 61.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 1993 23 17 40 57.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1994 16 14 30 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 321 149 470 68.3% 36 35 71 50.7% 30 21 51 58.8% 119 71 190 62.6% — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brad Gilbert Kim Warwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42
19 1981 1539 115.9 — — — — +37 +3 — 54.2% +0.29 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.40 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86
20 1982 1711 128.9 — — — — +36 -166 — 53.2% +0.34 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) — +3.49 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23
21 1983 1755 139.6 — — — — +45 -180 -152 55.0% +0.35 8–12 (40%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.52 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29
22 1984 1850 149.5 — — — — +41 -238 -166 58.2% +0.68 12–6 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.44 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10
23 1985 1893 156.7 — — — — +64 -196 -244 66.9% +1.09 9–4 (69%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.39 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45
24 1986 2010 155.6 — — — — +53 — -304 71.3% +1.25 8–8 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.05 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01
25 1987 1960 156.6 — — — — +62 -306 -271 65.2% +0.99 13–9 (59%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.22 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00
26 1988 1892 149.8 — — — — +48 -233 — 65.5% +1.01 4–8 (33%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.11 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65
27 1989 1989 161.9 — — — — +43 -294 — 70.1% +1.11 17–11 (61%) 21–9 (70%) — -2.28 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20
28 1990 1957 155.8 — — — — +31 -248 -181 63.5% +0.96 14–6 (70%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.79 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21
29 1991 1854 152.6 +2.35 +2.76 1.137 52.4% +49 — -81 58.9% +0.67 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.61 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26
30 1992 1763 144.3 +0.88 +2.28 1.085 51.6% +29 — +50 58.1% +0.60 14–13 (52%) 14–14 (50%) — +1.15 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50
31 1993 1737 137.0 -0.17 +0.74 0.967 49.4% 0 -90 +31 49.0% -0.10 19–9 (68%) 19–8 (70%) — +0.09 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
32 1994 1622 133.2 -2.08 +0.66 0.943 49.2% +29 +12 — 46.7% -0.14 6–4 (60%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.97 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40
33 1995 1561 107.9 -3.03 -2.86 0.745 45.4% +30 — — 20.0% -1.73 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.18 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23
Career — 2057 155.0 +0.41 +1.60 1.031 50.7% +42 -188 -127 60.6% +0.70 144–109 (57%) 144–106 (58%) 102.4 +0.46 — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.