H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brad Gilbert vs Kim Warwick H2H: 1-1
Brad Gilbert and Kim Warwick are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1983 US Open first round 2-6 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 2-6 6-1 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1982* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Brad Gilbert | 6-1 (ret.) | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Gilbert | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |