H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brad Gilbert vs Robert Seguso H2H: 1-1
Brad Gilbert and Robert Seguso are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robert Seguso leads 1–0 on carpet, while Brad Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brad Gilbert won the 1989 Scottsdale third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1989* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Brad Gilbert | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Robert Seguso | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1988* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Robert Seguso | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Brad Gilbert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | #1,263 | #4 | 1,786 | 2,053 | 502 | 275 | 64.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
| Robert Seguso | #773 | #22 | 242 | 1,885 | 86 | 90 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Gilbert | Robert Seguso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #321 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #62 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #209 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #18 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #11 | 2,009 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #13 | 1,968 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #37 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #6 | 1,987 | 0 | 17 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #367 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #10 | 1,952 | 0 | 20 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #818 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #35 | 1,735 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #76 | 1,621 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #680 | 1,559 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |