H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brad Pearce vs David Pate H2H: 2-2
Brad Pearce and David Pate are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Brad Pearce leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brad Pearce won the 1991 Charlotte third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1991* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Brad Pearce | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | David Pate | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1987* | Chicago | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | David Pate | 6-2 6-4 | Brad Pearce | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1986* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Brad Pearce | 6-2 7-6 | David Pate | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1986* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Pate | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Brad Pearce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Pearce | #870 | #71 | 483 | 1,711 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Pearce | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #287 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #288 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #78 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–19 | 9.5% | #359 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #343 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |