H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brad Pearce vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 2-1
Brad Pearce holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Brad Pearce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1992 Seoul third round 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1992* | Seoul | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Hogstedt | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 | Brad Pearce | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1991* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Brad Pearce | 6-1 5-5 (ret.) | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1990* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Brad Pearce | 6-2 7-5 | Thomas Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Pearce | #870 | #71 | 483 | 1,711 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brad Pearce | Thomas Hogstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #287 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #288 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #78 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–19 | 9.5% | #359 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #343 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |