H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:34 UTC
Brandon Nakashima vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 0-2
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–0 lead over Brandon Nakashima in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Australian Open first round 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | Brandon Nakashima | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2022* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Brandon Nakashima | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | #32 | #29 | 1,700 | 1,921 | 138 | 121 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #68 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #47 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #134 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |