H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–0 lead over Brandon Nakashima in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Australian Open first round 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | Brandon Nakashima | Match data | Jan 19, 2026 | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Brandon Nakashima | Match data | Apr 28, 2022* | R32 | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | #19 | #16 | 2,485 | 1,952 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #41 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 127 | 126 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #68 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #47 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #134 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #38 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #19 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #41 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1497 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1548 | 129.2 | +2.04 | +0.75 | 1.207 | 53.6% | +61 | — | — | 64.3% | +0.79 | 0–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1800 | 141.9 | +1.63 | +0.45 | 1.060 | 51.1% | +26 | — | — | 55.4% | +0.45 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–7 (53%) | 105.9 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1860 | 147.5 | +2.80 | -0.54 | 1.089 | 51.3% | -10 | -291 | -14 | 56.7% | +0.34 | 5–6 (45%) | 23–10 (70%) | 106.7 | +0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1684 | 134.4 | +1.89 | -1.46 | 1.015 | 49.9% | +3 | -99 | +55 | 44.3% | -0.11 | 5–10 (33%) | 14–13 (52%) | 95.4 | -0.78 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 1815 | 147.2 | +3.32 | -0.97 | 1.049 | 50.8% | -23 | -119 | -18 | 53.4% | +0.39 | 3–7 (30%) | 10–15 (40%) | 92.3 | -0.21 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 1782 | 146.7 | +2.07 | -0.50 | 1.068 | 50.8% | -5 | -98 | +38 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 10–9 (53%) | 19–24 (44%) | 97.6 | +1.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 1889 | 154.9 | +3.56 | +0.47 | 1.141 | 52.1% | +11 | -181 | -67 | 60.7% | +0.77 | 8–9 (47%) | 16–18 (47%) | 100.2 | +1.27 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1865 | 149.1 | -1.13 | +2.52 | 1.032 | 50.8% | +24 | -159 | -224 | 56.0% | +0.25 | 7–10 (41%) | 21–11 (66%) | 103.6 | -0.28 |
| Career | — | 1952 | 151.1 | +2.65 | -0.41 | 1.078 | 51.1% | +1 | -150 | -3 | 54.0% | +0.34 | 38–45 (46%) | 93–88 (51%) | 99.5 | +0.91 | — | 1933 | 149.2 | -0.95 | +1.98 | 1.003 | 50.0% | +6 | -67 | -106 | 49.2% | -0.06 | 41–40 (51%) | 67–54 (55%) | 106.5 | -2.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Jordan Thompson | 6 | 2 | 8 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Taylor Fritz | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |