H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Brandon Nakashima vs John Isner H2H: 3-1

Brandon Nakashima holds a 3–1 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Brandon Nakashima leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Brandon Nakashima won the 2023 Indian Wells Open first round 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brandon Nakashima
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brandon Nakashima #48 7-6(7) 6-3 John Isner #39 Match data Mar 10, 2023* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Brandon Nakashima #84 7-6(7) 7-6(6) 6-3 John Isner #22 Match data Sep 1, 2021* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
John Isner #35 7-6(8) 7-5 Brandon Nakashima #115 Match data Aug 1, 2021* F Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Brandon Nakashima #134 7-5 6-4 John Isner #39 Match data Jul 24, 2021* SF Los Cabos Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brandon Nakashima #17 #17 2,485 1,952 151 124 54.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brandon Nakashima John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2020 3–2 60.0% #166 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2021 15–10 60.0% #68 1,800 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2022 30–23 56.6% #47 1,860 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2023 13–20 39.4% #134 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2024 25–23 52.1% #38 1,815 0 1 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2025 33–29 53.2% #35 1,781 0 1 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0
24 2026 32–17 65.3% #17 1,946 0 1 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brandon Nakashima John Isner
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2020 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 21 16 37 56.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 13 14 27 48.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2025 21 19 40 52.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2026 23 10 33 69.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 105 83 188 55.9% 22 24 46 47.8% 24 17 41 58.5% — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/276 of Brandon Nakashima's and 756/764 of John Isner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Brandon Nakashima John Isner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2020 5/5 6.8 2.4 59.6% 73.4% 60.6% 75.0% 50.0% 68.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 25/25 7.8 2.3 57.7% 74.9% 54.0% 61.6% 50.0% 66.3% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 53/53 7.4 1.7 65.2% 74.5% 54.8% 57.0% 37.7% 67.5% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 33/33 7.5 2.1 64.9% 74.6% 51.3% 55.4% 33.5% 66.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 47/48 8.6 1.1 66.1% 74.7% 55.5% 69.2% 37.7% 68.4% 33.2% 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6%
23 2025 60/62 8.6 1.1 65.3% 74.7% 52.8% 57.7% 35.8% 67.1% 35.1% 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4%
24 2026 49/50 10.2 1.1 66.0% 78.6% 51.6% 57.9% 41.2% 69.4% 36.5% 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0%
Career — 272/276 8.4 1.5 64.7% 75.4% 53.5% 60.0% 38.8% 67.7% 35.0% — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brandon Nakashima John Isner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2018 1497 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 1548 129.2 +2.04 +0.75 1.207 53.6% +61 — — 64.3% +0.79 0–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2021 1800 141.9 +1.63 +0.45 1.060 51.1% +26 — — 55.4% +0.45 7–3 (70%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 1860 147.5 +2.80 -0.54 1.089 51.3% -10 -291 -14 56.7% +0.34 5–6 (45%) 23–10 (70%) — +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2023 1684 134.4 +1.89 -1.46 1.015 49.9% +3 -99 +55 44.3% -0.11 5–10 (33%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2024 1815 147.2 +3.32 -0.97 1.049 50.8% -23 -119 -18 53.4% +0.39 3–7 (30%) 10–15 (40%) — -0.21 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01
23 2025 1782 146.7 +2.07 -0.50 1.068 50.8% -5 -98 +38 50.0% +0.11 10–9 (53%) 19–24 (44%) — +1.72 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16
24 2026 1947 154.4 +4.03 +1.31 1.193 52.8% +12 -241 -129 63.2% +0.94 8–8 (50%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.23 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74
Career — 1952 150.9 +2.72 -0.27 1.085 51.2% +1 -163 -12 54.3% +0.37 38–44 (46%) 91–87 (51%) 99.5 +0.90 — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.