H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Brandon Nakashima vs Kamil Majchrzak H2H: 1-1
Brandon Nakashima and Kamil Majchrzak are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brandon Nakashima leads 1–0 on clay, while Kamil Majchrzak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kamil Majchrzak won the 2025 Rolex Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Poland
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2025* | Rolex Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kamil Majchrzak | 6-4 6-0 | Brandon Nakashima | Match data |
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Brandon Nakashima | 6-4 2-6 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data |
| May 8, 2022* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Brandon Nakashima | 6-4 7-6(5) | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | #32 | #29 | 1,700 | 1,921 | 138 | 121 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kamil Majchrzak | #66 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,822 | 46 | 55 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Kamil Majchrzak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #68 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #47 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #134 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #66 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |