H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Brandon Nakashima vs Marin Cilic H2H: 1-2

Marin Cilic holds a 2–1 lead over Brandon Nakashima in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marin Cilic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marin Cilic won the 2026 Miami Open second round 2-6 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brandon Nakashima
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Marin Cilic
Croatia Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marin Cilic #49 2-6 6-4 7-6(7) Brandon Nakashima #30 Match data Mar 21, 2026 R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Brandon Nakashima #29 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Marin Cilic #43 Match data Feb 17, 2026 R32 Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Marin Cilic #373 6-4 7-6(6) Brandon Nakashima #36 Match data Sep 23, 2024* SF Hangzhou Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brandon Nakashima #17 #17 2,485 1,952 151 124 54.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marin Cilic #81 #3 5,155 2,199 578 350 62.3% 1 1 0 2 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brandon Nakashima Marin Cilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #587 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 5–9 35.7% #170 1,498 0 0
18 2020 3–2 60.0% #166 1,547 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #71 1,714 0 0
19 2021 15–10 60.0% #68 1,800 0 0 2008 37–24 60.7% #23 1,908 0 1
20 2022 30–23 56.6% #47 1,860 0 1 2009 45–20 69.2% #14 1,991 0 3
21 2023 13–20 39.4% #134 1,683 0 1 2010 38–21 64.4% #14 1,856 0 5
22 2024 25–23 52.1% #38 1,815 0 1 2011 40–23 63.5% #21 1,966 0 6
23 2025 33–29 53.2% #35 1,781 0 1 2012 38–18 67.9% #15 2,004 0 8
24 2026 32–17 65.3% #17 1,946 0 1 2013 24–13 64.9% #37 2,005 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 2014 51–21 70.8% #9 2,130 1 13
26 — — — — — — — 2015 35–19 64.8% #13 2,064 1 14
27 — — — — — — — 2016 44–21 67.7% #6 2,135 1 16
28 — — — — — — — 2017 43–22 66.2% #6 2,055 1 17
29 — — — — — — — 2018 40–19 67.8% #7 2,053 1 18
30 — — — — — — — 2019 22–20 52.4% #39 1,912 1 18
31 — — — — — — — 2020 11–11 50.0% #42 1,841 1 18
32 — — — — — — — 2021 32–19 62.7% #30 1,928 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 2022 32–20 61.5% #17 1,953 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 2023 1–2 33.3% #672 1,933 1 20
35 — — — — — — — 2024 6–8 42.9% #179 1,827 1 21
36 — — — — — — — 2025 8–11 42.1% #73 1,825 1 21
37 — — — — — — — 2026 14–16 46.7% #81 1,748 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brandon Nakashima Marin Cilic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2020 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2021 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 25 15 40 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2022 21 16 37 56.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 34 13 47 72.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2023 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2010 28 14 42 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2024 13 14 27 48.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2011 25 14 39 64.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2025 21 19 40 52.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 14 10 24 58.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
24 2026 23 10 33 69.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 14 6 20 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 37 13 50 74.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 21 10 31 67.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 15 34 55.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 24 13 37 64.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 18 12 30 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 20 14 34 58.8% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 9 8 17 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
Career — 105 83 188 55.9% 22 24 46 47.8% 24 17 41 58.5% — — — — — 362 218 580 62.4% 128 91 219 58.4% 84 37 121 69.4% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/276 of Brandon Nakashima's and 909/929 of Marin Cilic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Brandon Nakashima Marin Cilic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 2.0 2.0 50.8% 56.3% 45.2% 20.0% 50.0% 50.8% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 14/14 5.4 3.5 54.6% 69.3% 48.4% 59.9% 29.1% 59.6% 34.4%
18 2020 5/5 6.8 2.4 59.6% 73.4% 60.6% 75.0% 50.0% 68.6% 37.9% 2007 24/24 7.0 3.5 52.6% 74.3% 48.5% 57.9% 51.0% 62.1% 36.1%
19 2021 25/25 7.8 2.3 57.7% 74.9% 54.0% 61.6% 50.0% 66.3% 35.7% 2008 59/61 9.3 3.3 53.6% 75.6% 53.2% 60.5% 38.4% 65.3% 37.5%
20 2022 53/53 7.4 1.7 65.2% 74.5% 54.8% 57.0% 37.7% 67.5% 35.3% 2009 65/65 7.8 2.7 56.6% 75.5% 53.6% 61.0% 38.2% 66.3% 40.0%
21 2023 33/33 7.5 2.1 64.9% 74.6% 51.3% 55.4% 33.5% 66.6% 34.0% 2010 59/59 7.2 2.5 58.1% 74.6% 53.5% 66.4% 43.0% 65.7% 38.0%
22 2024 47/48 8.6 1.1 66.1% 74.7% 55.5% 69.2% 37.7% 68.4% 33.2% 2011 62/63 7.0 2.6 54.7% 76.4% 54.7% 59.1% 44.6% 66.8% 38.3%
23 2025 60/62 8.6 1.1 65.3% 74.7% 52.8% 57.7% 35.8% 67.1% 35.1% 2012 54/56 6.2 2.7 55.5% 72.4% 53.2% 53.2% 46.7% 64.0% 40.4%
24 2026 49/50 10.2 1.1 66.0% 78.6% 51.6% 57.9% 41.2% 69.4% 36.5% 2013 36/37 8.4 2.4 56.4% 76.9% 57.0% 62.5% 43.3% 68.1% 38.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 71/72 10.4 2.8 56.9% 79.0% 50.9% 67.0% 39.5% 66.9% 38.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 54/54 12.0 2.6 58.8% 77.6% 52.0% 63.8% 41.8% 67.0% 36.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 62/65 10.4 2.4 55.4% 80.1% 54.7% 59.5% 40.4% 68.9% 37.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 64/65 11.3 3.1 58.5% 79.9% 54.9% 60.5% 42.7% 69.6% 39.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 58/59 10.2 3.1 58.8% 80.1% 55.1% 57.3% 40.3% 69.9% 38.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/42 9.7 5.0 58.3% 77.4% 47.7% 61.0% 41.9% 65.1% 35.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 21/22 10.0 3.8 59.8% 76.2% 50.1% 61.4% 33.4% 65.6% 35.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/51 11.1 3.9 58.2% 79.0% 49.9% 62.9% 38.5% 66.6% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/52 11.5 3.4 59.9% 78.9% 52.2% 61.1% 41.2% 68.0% 38.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/3 9.5 3.0 65.4% 71.9% 42.9% 64.6% 21.4% 62.6% 33.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 14/14 12.1 4.0 56.2% 77.9% 50.3% 59.7% 54.3% 65.8% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 19/19 8.7 2.8 57.0% 75.5% 50.9% 55.9% 35.8% 64.8% 30.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 29/31 9.1 3.2 58.6% 76.8% 48.4% 61.5% 37.2% 65.2% 35.0%
Career — 272/276 8.4 1.5 64.7% 75.4% 53.5% 60.0% 38.8% 67.7% 35.0% — 909/929 9.3 3.0 57.0% 77.1% 52.6% 60.9% 41.2% 66.6% 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brandon Nakashima Marin Cilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2018 1497 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.9 -3.62 -1.03 0.677 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1498 111.3 -1.65 -2.46 0.850 47.4% -25 +64 — 37.1% -0.77 4–3 (57%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.29
18 2020 1548 129.2 +2.04 +0.75 1.207 53.6% +61 — — 64.3% +0.79 0–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.05 2007 1715 126.8 -0.80 -0.10 0.954 49.3% -39 -98 -126 47.5% -0.11 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.13
19 2021 1800 141.9 +1.63 +0.45 1.060 51.1% +26 — — 55.4% +0.45 7–3 (70%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.32 2008 1908 151.0 +2.06 +1.34 1.082 51.4% -11 -243 -142 57.3% +0.46 10–8 (56%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.68
20 2022 1860 147.5 +2.80 -0.54 1.089 51.3% -10 -291 -14 56.7% +0.34 5–6 (45%) 23–10 (70%) — +0.88 2009 1992 159.4 +3.31 +2.77 1.188 52.7% +28 -214 -200 64.9% +1.04 13–8 (62%) 14–16 (47%) — +2.37
21 2023 1684 134.4 +1.89 -1.46 1.015 49.9% +3 -99 +55 44.3% -0.11 5–10 (33%) 14–13 (52%) — -0.78 2010 1857 158.2 +2.35 +1.40 1.109 51.8% +72 +14 -102 58.6% +0.73 13–5 (72%) 11–19 (37%) — +1.24
22 2024 1815 147.2 +3.32 -0.97 1.049 50.8% -23 -119 -18 53.4% +0.39 3–7 (30%) 10–15 (40%) — -0.21 2011 1966 162.8 +4.08 +1.86 1.156 52.2% +25 -52 -198 59.6% +0.62 12–7 (63%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.09
23 2025 1782 146.7 +2.07 -0.50 1.068 50.8% -5 -98 +38 50.0% +0.11 10–9 (53%) 19–24 (44%) — +1.72 2012 2005 160.0 +1.42 +3.57 1.123 52.2% -30 +11 -22 62.0% +0.74 8–3 (73%) 11–15 (42%) — +1.95
24 2026 1947 154.4 +4.03 +1.31 1.193 52.8% +12 -241 -129 63.2% +0.94 8–8 (50%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.23 2013 2005 157.1 +3.69 +2.41 1.208 52.9% +18 -88 +81 63.4% +0.90 8–5 (62%) 11–4 (73%) — +0.69
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2130 169.3 +3.49 +2.72 1.150 52.3% +34 -173 -10 65.8% +0.76 13–9 (59%) 20–9 (69%) — -2.53
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2064 160.5 +3.04 +1.34 1.114 51.7% +53 -93 +78 60.4% +0.54 12–8 (60%) 26–9 (74%) — +1.96
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2136 171.9 +5.19 +1.67 1.193 52.6% +11 -180 +58 63.1% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.16
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 2055 166.2 +4.81 +4.38 1.303 53.9% -89 -3 +181 63.1% +0.91 10–12 (45%) 16–14 (53%) — +0.86
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2054 170.8 +5.78 +3.23 1.264 53.3% -14 +7 +214 64.3% +0.99 9–10 (47%) 20–18 (53%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1912 154.6 +1.14 -0.18 1.003 50.4% +27 +85 +277 54.5% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 16–9 (64%) — +1.07
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1842 146.2 +1.45 -0.54 1.037 50.2% +6 +126 — 45.5% -0.05 7–4 (64%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1929 146.3 +3.33 +0.85 1.108 51.7% -35 +4 +247 57.9% +0.43 13–8 (62%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1953 160.1 +4.07 +1.98 1.190 52.7% -43 +52 +215 60.6% +0.86 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1933 104.1 +0.22 +0.03 0.907 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.03
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1827 133.0 +0.92 -0.98 0.975 50.1% -8 — — 45.7% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1825 142.2 +1.69 -2.10 0.870 48.1% +3 — +327 43.1% -0.45 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.90
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1748 138.1 +0.72 +0.13 1.005 50.1% +67 0 +278 48.6% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.87
Career — 1952 150.9 +2.72 -0.27 1.085 51.2% +1 -163 -12 54.3% +0.37 38–44 (46%) 91–87 (51%) 99.5 +0.90 — 2200 164.7 +3.06 +1.77 1.127 51.9% +6 -47 +77 59.1% +0.60 170–127 (57%) 230–214 (52%) 99.2 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.