H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Brandon Nakashima vs Viktor Troicki.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Viktor Troicki | Match data | Jun 29, 2021* | Q2 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | #17 | #17 | 2,485 | 1,952 | 151 | 124 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,006 | 270 | 259 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #68 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #47 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #134 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #38 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,946 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #29 | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,668 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2020 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2007 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2008 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 23 | 2025 | 21 | 19 | 40 | 52.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2009 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2010 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24 | 17 | 41 | 58.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19 | 17 | 36 | 52.8% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27 | 20 | 47 | 57.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 45.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 105 | 83 | 188 | 55.9% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 24 | 17 | 41 | 58.5% | — | 179 | 168 | 347 | 51.6% | 58 | 60 | 118 | 49.2% | 33 | 31 | 64 | 51.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/276 of Brandon Nakashima's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2020 | 5/5 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 59.6% | 73.4% | 60.6% | 75.0% | 50.0% | 68.6% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.8 | 2.3 | 57.7% | 74.9% | 54.0% | 61.6% | 50.0% | 66.3% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 53/53 | 7.4 | 1.7 | 65.2% | 74.5% | 54.8% | 57.0% | 37.7% | 67.5% | 35.3% | 2006 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 61.4% | 70.4% | 53.0% | 43.3% | 63.9% | 63.8% | 37.0% |
| 21 | 2023 | 33/33 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 64.9% | 74.6% | 51.3% | 55.4% | 33.5% | 66.6% | 34.0% | 2007 | 12/12 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 59.0% | 64.4% | 42.5% | 46.9% | 45.4% | 55.6% | 37.8% |
| 22 | 2024 | 47/48 | 8.6 | 1.1 | 66.1% | 74.7% | 55.5% | 69.2% | 37.7% | 68.4% | 33.2% | 2008 | 37/38 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 61.7% | 73.4% | 51.5% | 51.7% | 37.9% | 65.0% | 37.2% |
| 23 | 2025 | 60/62 | 8.6 | 1.1 | 65.3% | 74.7% | 52.8% | 57.7% | 35.8% | 67.1% | 35.1% | 2009 | 54/54 | 6.9 | 2.6 | 57.6% | 70.1% | 44.7% | 60.8% | 46.7% | 58.8% | 36.4% |
| 24 | 2026 | 49/50 | 10.2 | 1.1 | 66.0% | 78.6% | 51.6% | 57.9% | 41.2% | 69.4% | 36.5% | 2010 | 59/61 | 9.2 | 2.9 | 60.1% | 75.0% | 50.6% | 59.4% | 46.1% | 64.9% | 41.3% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 58/58 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 58.9% | 72.9% | 47.2% | 63.6% | 47.1% | 62.2% | 39.9% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 47/48 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 59.7% | 70.0% | 44.0% | 52.2% | 42.4% | 59.3% | 36.5% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 36/36 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 70.5% | 47.5% | 49.6% | 43.4% | 61.2% | 37.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12/12 | 9.1 | 2.2 | 55.0% | 79.4% | 52.5% | 59.5% | 45.9% | 66.9% | 40.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 60/60 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 74.5% | 49.8% | 57.1% | 41.3% | 65.5% | 36.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 60/61 | 8.5 | 2.3 | 61.2% | 74.2% | 49.9% | 56.0% | 40.2% | 64.7% | 36.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 49/51 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 60.7% | 71.2% | 46.7% | 53.9% | 41.1% | 61.8% | 35.4% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19/19 | 8.2 | 3.2 | 63.5% | 69.8% | 41.2% | 53.1% | 33.5% | 59.3% | 33.5% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8/8 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 62.0% | 72.5% | 51.7% | 53.0% | 46.4% | 64.7% | 33.0% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3/4 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 72.0% | 67.1% | 48.2% | 57.3% | 32.3% | 61.5% | 31.7% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5/5 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 63.5% | 74.1% | 55.0% | 44.1% | 19.9% | 66.4% | 26.2% |
| Career | — | 272/276 | 8.4 | 1.5 | 64.7% | 75.4% | 53.5% | 60.0% | 38.8% | 67.7% | 35.0% | — | 521/529 | 7.9 | 2.5 | 60.4% | 72.4% | 47.9% | 56.1% | 42.7% | 62.6% | 37.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Brandon Nakashima | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1497 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1548 | 129.2 | +2.04 | +0.75 | 1.207 | 53.6% | +61 | — | — | 64.3% | +0.79 | 0–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1800 | 141.9 | +1.63 | +0.45 | 1.060 | 51.1% | +26 | — | — | 55.4% | +0.45 | 7–3 (70%) | 8–7 (53%) | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1860 | 147.5 | +2.80 | -0.54 | 1.089 | 51.3% | -10 | -291 | -14 | 56.7% | +0.34 | 5–6 (45%) | 23–10 (70%) | — | +0.88 | 2006 | 1497 | 108.2 | +2.42 | +2.63 | 1.020 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.60 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.15 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1684 | 134.4 | +1.89 | -1.46 | 1.015 | 49.9% | +3 | -99 | +55 | 44.3% | -0.11 | 5–10 (33%) | 14–13 (52%) | — | -0.78 | 2007 | 1634 | 117.7 | -4.28 | -0.04 | 0.852 | 47.0% | -40 | +23 | — | 44.4% | -0.89 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.12 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1815 | 147.2 | +3.32 | -0.97 | 1.049 | 50.8% | -23 | -119 | -18 | 53.4% | +0.39 | 3–7 (30%) | 10–15 (40%) | — | -0.21 | 2008 | 1791 | 139.5 | +1.49 | +1.42 | 1.065 | 50.4% | +8 | -175 | -178 | 49.4% | -0.01 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -1.41 |
| 23 | 2025 | 1782 | 146.7 | +2.07 | -0.50 | 1.068 | 50.8% | -5 | -98 | +38 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 10–9 (53%) | 19–24 (44%) | — | +1.72 | 2009 | 1806 | 148.2 | -2.68 | +0.14 | 0.884 | 48.1% | +16 | -130 | -137 | 48.4% | -0.29 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–8 (47%) | — | -2.24 |
| 24 | 2026 | 1947 | 154.4 | +4.03 | +1.31 | 1.193 | 52.8% | +12 | -241 | -129 | 63.2% | +0.94 | 8–8 (50%) | 14–17 (45%) | — | +1.23 | 2010 | 1925 | 159.4 | +1.84 | +4.42 | 1.176 | 52.7% | +14 | -165 | -279 | 57.0% | +0.59 | 8–9 (47%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | -1.68 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1847 | 157.5 | +0.04 | +2.75 | 1.056 | 51.0% | +36 | +1 | -155 | 58.3% | +0.38 | 5–7 (42%) | 9–11 (45%) | — | +1.82 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1766 | 146.1 | -2.61 | -0.08 | 0.896 | 48.1% | -2 | +12 | -4 | 45.3% | -0.24 | 10–8 (56%) | 9–9 (50%) | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1825 | 139.7 | -1.42 | -0.04 | 0.966 | 49.1% | -123 | +24 | -40 | 51.1% | -0.08 | 5–3 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +0.52 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1904 | 142.7 | +2.91 | +1.97 | 1.214 | 53.2% | -67 | -35 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.99 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1847 | 149.3 | +0.59 | +0.86 | 1.051 | 50.6% | -26 | -34 | +98 | 51.5% | +0.18 | 14–8 (64%) | 14–17 (45%) | — | +1.04 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1896 | 159.7 | +1.47 | +0.63 | 1.039 | 50.5% | +8 | -14 | -47 | 50.6% | -0.07 | 14–7 (67%) | 18–7 (72%) | — | +0.26 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1814 | 148.1 | -1.84 | -0.08 | 0.926 | 48.5% | +24 | +20 | -93 | 43.4% | -0.58 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | -1.56 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1668 | 123.1 | -3.95 | -1.30 | 0.822 | 46.3% | +48 | +95 | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | -0.36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1643 | 117.7 | +0.21 | -1.72 | 0.935 | 48.8% | +10 | — | +142 | 47.8% | -0.39 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.39 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1648 | 116.8 | -1.33 | -1.24 | 0.824 | 47.6% | +41 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.25 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1650 | 110.9 | +0.71 | -3.52 | 0.779 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 30.8% | -0.92 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.04 |
| Career | — | 1952 | 150.9 | +2.72 | -0.27 | 1.085 | 51.2% | +1 | -163 | -12 | 54.3% | +0.37 | 38–44 (46%) | 91–87 (51%) | 99.5 | +0.90 | — | 2006 | 151.3 | -0.39 | +1.02 | 0.995 | 49.8% | +6 | -32 | -45 | 49.9% | -0.05 | 91–69 (57%) | 106–105 (50%) | 103.5 | -0.72 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Tiafoe | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Jordan Thompson | 6 | 2 | 8 | Sep 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Taylor Fritz | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 0 | 6 | 6 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | 1 | 13 | 14 | Feb 27, 2013 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 16, 2016 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 9 | 9 | Feb 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Marcos Baghdatis | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 28, 2018 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 0 | 8 | 8 | Aug 8, 2016 | H2H |