H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brett Steven vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-0
Brett Steven holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brett Steven leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brett Steven won the 1995 Memphis third round 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1995* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Brett Steven | 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |