H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brett Steven vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 0-1
Chris Woodruff holds a 1–0 lead over Brett Steven in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Woodruff won the 1997 San Jose fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1997* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Chris Woodruff | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Brett Steven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Woodruff | #1,334 | #29 | 1,273 | 1,829 | 108 | 106 | 50.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Chris Woodruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #337 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #118 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |