H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Brett Steven vs Jan-Michael Gambill H2H: 0-1
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Brett Steven in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 1998 Singapore fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1998* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jan-Michael Gambill | (w/o) | Brett Steven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Jan-Michael Gambill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 |