H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Brett Steven vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-1
Brett Steven and Jim Grabb are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Brett Steven won the 1994 Tokyo Indoor second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1994* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Brett Steven | 6-3 7-5 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Brett Steven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |