H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brett Steven vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-1
Brett Steven and Mark Knowles are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brett Steven leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brett Steven won the 1997 Shanghai third round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1997* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Brett Steven | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Mark Knowles | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mark Knowles | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Brett Steven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |