H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Brett Steven vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Brett Steven in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 1997 New Haven fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1997* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-4 | Brett Steven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |