H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Brett Steven vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-1
Brett Steven holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Brett Steven leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Brett Steven won the 1998 Rotterdam quarterfinal 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 57
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1998* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Brett Steven | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1993 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Carbonell | 6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | Brett Steven | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1993* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Brett Steven | 6-2 6-3 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Steven | #1,173 | #32 | 964 | 1,853 | 157 | 152 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brett Steven | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #556 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #226 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #73 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #43 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #87 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #42 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #100 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #50 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1998 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #92 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #206 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |