H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Brian Gottfried vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 2-0
Brian Gottfried holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brian Gottfried leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brian Gottfried won the 1976 Vienna fourth round 5-7 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1976* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Brian Gottfried | 5-7 7-6 6-1 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Brian Gottfried | 6-2 6-2 9-7 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Gottfried | #431 | #3 | 0 | 2,237 | 695 | 322 | 68.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brian Gottfried | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #21 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 56–33 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,946 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 70–31 | 69.3% | #23 | 1,963 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 68–29 | 70.1% | #10 | 2,110 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 107–22 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1978 | 72–24 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,999 | 0 | 15 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1979 | 54–23 | 70.1% | #16 | 1,978 | 0 | 17 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 68–23 | 74.7% | #11 | 1,997 | 0 | 21 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #18 | 1,945 | 0 | 22 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #22 | 1,948 | 0 | 24 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 25 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #90 | 1,723 | 0 | 25 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |