H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Broderick Dyke vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-0
Broderick Dyke holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Broderick Dyke leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Broderick Dyke won the 1987 Rotterdam third round 7-5 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 65
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1987* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Broderick Dyke | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broderick Dyke | #819 | #35 | 221 | 1,715 | 78 | 121 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Broderick Dyke | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #179 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #113 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1990 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #752 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #696 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |