H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Bruce Manson vs Adriano Panatta H2H: 1-1
Bruce Manson and Adriano Panatta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bruce Manson leads 1–0 on clay, while Adriano Panatta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1982 Rome second round 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1982* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bruce Manson | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Adriano Panatta | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1979* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Adriano Panatta | 6-4 6-4 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adriano Panatta | #807 | #4 | 0 | 2,172 | 379 | 226 | 62.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bruce Manson | Adriano Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #34 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #14 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #7 | 2,020 | 1 | 7 |
| 26 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #23 | 1,951 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,933 | 1 | 9 |
| 28 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #28 | 1,867 | 1 | 10 |
| 29 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #32 | 1,937 | 1 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #40 | 1,787 | 1 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #96 | 1,708 | 1 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,642 | 1 | 11 |