H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bruce Manson vs Ross Case H2H: 1-1
Bruce Manson and Ross Case are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 1–0 on clay, while Bruce Manson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1980 Wimbledon second round 7-6 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Bruce Manson | 7-6 7-6 7-5 | Ross Case | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ross Case | 6-2 6-4 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ross Case | #758 | #14 | 0 | 1,960 | 294 | 276 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bruce Manson | Ross Case | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 22–21 | 51.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 42–34 | 55.3% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 43–28 | 60.6% | #29 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #27 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #45 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #55 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #163 | 1,619 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #215 | 1,466 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #415 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |