H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bruce Manson vs Victor Amaya H2H: 2-2
Bruce Manson and Victor Amaya are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Victor Amaya leads 2–0 on grass, while Bruce Manson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bruce Manson won the 1982 Columbus fourth round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Left-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1982* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Bruce Manson | 7-6 6-4 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1980* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Victor Amaya | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1980* | Dayton | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bruce Manson | 6-7 6-3 6-3 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1974* | Merion | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Victor Amaya | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Bruce Manson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce Manson | #597 | #39 | 0 | 1,838 | 129 | 171 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victor Amaya | #739 | #15 | 0 | 1,988 | 187 | 173 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bruce Manson | Victor Amaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #187 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #215 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #96 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #105 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #105 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #83 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #85 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #135 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #73 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |