H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Bruno Oresar vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 0-1

Bill Scanlon holds a 1–0 lead over Bruno Oresar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1986 Miami Open round of 128 6-4 6-3.

CRO Age 59 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bill Scanlon #145 6-4 6-3 Bruno Oresar #86 Match data Feb 11, 1986* R128 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bruno Oresar #673 #46 296 1,713 52 68 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,018 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bruno Oresar Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1985 6–5 54.5% #82 1,565 0 0
19 1986 6–10 37.5% #159 1,587 0 0 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,653 0 0
20 1987 5–9 35.7% #111 1,550 0 0 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,724 0 0
21 1988 16–12 57.1% #57 1,653 0 0 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,765 0 1
22 1989 9–14 39.1% #88 1,575 0 0 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,837 0 2
23 1990 7–16 30.4% #159 1,547 0 0 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,809 0 2
24 1991 3–2 60.0% #239 1,576 0 0 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,880 0 5
25 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,849 0 6
26 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,924 0 6
27 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,829 0 6
28 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,669 0 6
29 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,535 0 7
32 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,599 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bruno Oresar Bill Scanlon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1987 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1977 7 7 14 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1978 8 5 13 61.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9%
24 1991 3 2 5 60.0% 1981 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 8 25 68.0%
25 1982 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
26 1983 13 6 19 68.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2%
27 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1987 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0%
31 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 13 17 30 43.3% 37 44 81 45.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 107 85 192 55.7% 34 47 81 42.0% 59 41 100 59.0% 107 86 193 55.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bruno Oresar Bill Scanlon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1985 1566 126.2 +35 53.8% +0.08 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.07
19 1986 1588 122.3 +32 40.5% -0.78 1–1 3–0 (100%) -0.71 1976 1654 142.6 -38 -5 48.0% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 4–3 (57%) -0.46
20 1987 1551 117.9 -37 +23 40.0% -0.17 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) +0.10 1977 1725 137.5 +17 -86 -47 51.5% 0.00 14–7 (67%) 10–14 (42%) +2.62
21 1988 1654 130.2 -95 +32 52.2% +0.09 6–3 (67%) 6–4 (60%) +1.73 1978 1766 135.3 +66 -179 40.9% -0.83 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) -1.30
22 1989 1576 113.9 -40 +33 40.4% -0.49 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) +0.22 1979 1838 143.2 +6 -227 -82 58.0% +0.56 4–6 (40%) 8–10 (44%) +1.44
23 1990 1547 120.7 +45 -1 37.1% -0.82 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) -1.01 1980 1810 150.9 +21 -150 -29 52.8% +0.11 17–12 (59%) 14–14 (50%) -5.33
24 1991 1576 110.4 +0.38 +0.80 1.126 52.3% +7 54.5% +0.82 1–0 0–1 +0.37 1981 1881 150.7 +56 -101 60.1% +0.75 9–4 (69%) 9–4 (69%) -0.11
25 1982 1850 150.4 +33 -212 50.7% -0.13 10–9 (53%) 11–8 (58%) -0.56
26 1983 1925 157.4 +31 -244 -85 61.4% +0.77 13–5 (72%) 11–15 (42%) -3.38
27 1984 1830 139.9 -2 -125 +21 51.6% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 5–12 (29%) +0.20
28 1985 1669 116.8 +90 +99 39.6% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) +0.21
29 1986 1657 124.4 +15 +146 50.0% +0.23 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) +2.27
30 1987 1562 119.1 +53 +169 42.7% -0.44 6–2 (75%) 6–11 (35%) +2.59
31 1988 1535 117.2 +7 +156 40.0% -0.86 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -0.45
32 1989 1600 129.3 +18 44.0% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -1.52
Career 1714 128.3 +0.38 +0.80 1.126 52.3% -24 +26 44.1% -0.32 17–17 (50%) 19–21 (48%) 100.8 +0.64 2018 148.5 +28 -134 +24 51.7% +0.09 103–80 (56%) 99–110 (47%) 102.8 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.