H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Buster C Mottram vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-0
Buster C Mottram holds a 1–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1977 Springfield third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1977* | Springfield | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Buster C Mottram | 6-2 6-1 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Buster C Mottram | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |
| 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |