H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Buster C Mottram vs Tom Okker H2H: 2-2
Buster C Mottram and Tom Okker are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tom Okker leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Buster C Mottram won the 1980 Hilversum quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1980* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 7-5 6-3 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1978* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tom Okker | 7-6 7-5 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1975* | Johannesburg - Wct | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Buster C Mottram | 6-4 6-2 | Tom Okker | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1975* | Bologna Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Buster C Mottram | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |