H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Butch Seewagen vs Pat Cramer H2H: 0-2
Pat Cramer holds a 2–0 lead over Butch Seewagen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pat Cramer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cramer won the 1973 Baltimore fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1973* | Baltimore | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Pat Cramer | 6-3 6-4 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1968* | San Antonio Collegiate | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Pat Cramer | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butch Seewagen | #826 | #87 | 0 | 1,679 | 67 | 83 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Butch Seewagen | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #200 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |