H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Butch Seewagen vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 1-2
Patricio Cornejo holds a 2–1 lead over Butch Seewagen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patricio Cornejo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricio Cornejo won the 1971 Cincinnati third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 82
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1971* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 7-6 6-3 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1971* | Tanglewood | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Butch Seewagen | 6-2 6-2 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1969* | Southampton | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Patricio Cornejo | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Butch Seewagen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butch Seewagen | #826 | #87 | 0 | 1,679 | 67 | 83 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricio Cornejo | #335 | #65 | 0 | 1,708 | 142 | 202 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Butch Seewagen | Patricio Cornejo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #96 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #200 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–32 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1977 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1978 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #227 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #108 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #69 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #172 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |