H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
C. Pasarell vs T. Edlefsen H2H: 4-1
C. Pasarell holds a 4–1 lead over T. Edlefsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, C. Pasarell leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, C. Pasarell won the 1973 Kansas City fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1973* | Kansas City | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | C. Pasarell | 7-6 6-3 | T. Edlefsen | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1973* | Lacosta Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | T. Edlefsen | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | C. Pasarell | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1970* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | C. Pasarell | 6-4 6-4 | T. Edlefsen | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1969* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | C. Pasarell | 7-5 6-4 | T. Edlefsen | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | C. Pasarell | 6-1 9-7 6-2 | T. Edlefsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| T. Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | C. Pasarell | T. Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |