H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
C. Steeb vs T. Hogstedt H2H: 1-0
C. Steeb holds a 1–0 lead over T. Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, C. Steeb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, C. Steeb won the 1990 Brussels fourth round 7-6 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1990* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | C. Steeb | 7-6 4-6 6-2 | T. Hogstedt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| T. Hogstedt | #1,032 | #38 | 413 | 1,736 | 90 | 153 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | C. Steeb | T. Hogstedt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #549 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #82 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #84 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #210 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #179 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #133 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–26 | 31.6% | #91 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #309 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |