H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Cameron Norrie vs Daniel Evans H2H: 2-0
Cameron Norrie holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cameron Norrie leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cameron Norrie won the 2021 San Diego fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 30
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2021* | San Diego | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cameron Norrie | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Cameron Norrie | 6-4 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Norrie | #38 | #8 | 3,550 | 2,071 | 237 | 181 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cameron Norrie | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #53 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #12 | 1,996 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #14 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #18 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |