H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cameron Norrie vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Cameron Norrie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2019 Eastbourne fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 30
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Kyle Edmund | 6-2 6-2 | Cameron Norrie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Norrie | #38 | #8 | 3,550 | 2,071 | 237 | 181 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cameron Norrie | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #53 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #12 | 1,996 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #14 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #18 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |