H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:17 UTC
Cameron Norrie vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 1-1
Cameron Norrie and Nicolas Jarry are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cameron Norrie leads 1–0 on grass, while Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cameron Norrie won the 2025 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 7-6 6-7 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 30
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2025* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Cameron Norrie | 6-3 7-6 6-7 6-7 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| May 12, 2019* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Cameron Norrie | 6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2018* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Jarry | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Cameron Norrie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Norrie | #38 | #8 | 3,550 | 2,071 | 237 | 181 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cameron Norrie | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #53 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #12 | 1,996 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #14 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #18 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |