H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Cameron Norrie vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 1-1
Cameron Norrie and Thiago Monteiro are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cameron Norrie leads 1–0 on clay, while Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cameron Norrie won the 2023 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 30
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Cameron Norrie | 7-5 7-5 | Thiago Monteiro | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2020* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thiago Monteiro | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Cameron Norrie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Norrie | #38 | #8 | 3,550 | 2,071 | 237 | 181 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cameron Norrie | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #53 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #12 | 1,996 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #14 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #18 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |