H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Carl Limberger vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 1-1
Carl Limberger and Joakim Nystrom are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Carl Limberger won the 1989 Monte Carlo third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carl Limberger | 6-1 6-1 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| May 9, 1987* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Joakim Nystrom | 7-6 6-3 | Carl Limberger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Limberger | #856 | #71 | 262 | 1,598 | 34 | 76 | 30.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carl Limberger | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #234 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #108 | 1,407 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1987 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #147 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #130 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1989 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #235 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 1992 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |