H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Carl Uwe Steeb vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carl Uwe Steeb leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1989 Gstaad fourth round 4-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1989* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Carl Uwe Steeb | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1988* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-2 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carl Uwe Steeb | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |