H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carl Uwe Steeb vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-0
Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-7 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Carl Uwe Steeb | 7-6 6-7 6-3 7-6 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carl Uwe Steeb | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |