H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Carl Uwe Steeb vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-1

Carl Uwe Steeb and Jimmy Connors are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on carpet, while Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1989 Hamburg quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carl Uwe Steeb
GER Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 1989* Hamburg ATP 250 QF Clay Carl Uwe Steeb #51 6-4 6-1 Jimmy Connors #12 Match data
Feb 20, 1988* Milan ATP 250 QF Carpet Jimmy Connors #6 7-5 6-3 Carl Uwe Steeb #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carl Uwe Steeb #1,355 #14 1,095 1,920 189 190 49.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carl Uwe Steeb Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1986 2–4 33.3% #150 1,499 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1987 10–8 55.6% #41 1,615 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1988 19–18 51.4% #73 1,680 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1989 34–15 69.4% #15 1,857 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1990 21–21 50.0% #46 1,711 0 1 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1991 27–27 50.0% #38 1,745 0 2 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1992 31–24 56.4% #29 1,787 0 2 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1993 18–20 47.4% #94 1,718 0 2 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1994 8–18 30.8% #89 1,607 0 2 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1995 12–16 42.9% #67 1,660 0 3 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1996 7–19 26.9% #179 1,540 0 3 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 — — — — — — — 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109