H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carl Uwe Steeb vs Roberto Azar H2H: 2-1
Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 2–1 lead over Roberto Azar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1991 Prague third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1991* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-4 6-4 | Roberto Azar | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1990* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-3 6-3 | Roberto Azar | Match data |
| May 10, 1990* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Roberto Azar | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Roberto Azar | #1,228 | #81 | 455 | 1,691 | 49 | 90 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carl Uwe Steeb | Roberto Azar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #257 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #106 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #96 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #238 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |