H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Carlos Alcaraz vs Daniel Evans H2H: 4-0
Carlos Alcaraz holds a 4–0 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carlos Alcaraz leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Alcaraz won the 2023 Shanghai Masters third round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 23
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2023* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2023* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | SF | Clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-2 6-2 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2021* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-4 6-3 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Alcaraz | #3 | #1 | 13,650 | 2,402 | 284 | 66 | 81.1% | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 26 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Alcaraz | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #32 | 1,946 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 55–12 | 82.1% | #1 | 2,151 | 1 | 6 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #2 | 2,211 | 2 | 12 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 44–12 | 78.6% | #3 | 2,178 | 4 | 16 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 70–8 | 89.7% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #3 | 2,339 | 7 | 26 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |