H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Carlos Berlocq holds a 1–0 lead over Andre Ghem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2011 Costa Do Sauipe round of 32 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | 6-4 6-3 | Andre Ghem | Match data | Feb 10, 2011* | R32 | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 187 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andre Ghem | #1,359 | #118 | 469 | 1,593 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Andre Ghem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–29 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Andre Ghem | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 27 | 57 | 84 | 32.1% | 94 | 112 | 206 | 45.6% | 6 | 18 | 24 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's and 7/7 of Andre Ghem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Andre Ghem | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 2005 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.5% | 68.0% | 29.4% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 52.4% | 30.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 22/22 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 59.9% | 60.1% | 45.1% | 54.3% | 54.5% | 53.6% | 38.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 23/26 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 61.9% | 66.6% | 50.1% | 54.9% | 40.9% | 59.6% | 34.5% | 2006 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 54.7% | 72.1% | 49.7% | 71.7% | 47.6% | 61.5% | 31.5% |
| 25 | 2008 | 19/19 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 61.7% | 63.4% | 43.1% | 46.0% | 40.2% | 56.0% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 6/6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 48.1% | 56.2% | 38.7% | 57.2% | 36.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 37/38 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 61.8% | 67.3% | 48.4% | 51.3% | 38.1% | 59.9% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 51/52 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 65.9% | 65.3% | 50.3% | 53.2% | 39.2% | 59.9% | 40.1% | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 55.2% | 71.9% | 46.2% | 40.0% | 0.0% | 60.3% | 26.0% |
| 30 | 2013 | 49/50 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 67.8% | 70.4% | 50.0% | 55.5% | 41.8% | 63.7% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 33/34 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 67.4% | 66.7% | 49.6% | 60.6% | 43.9% | 61.1% | 39.8% | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 59.2% | 70.0% | 41.0% | 65.7% | 92.9% | 59.3% | 49.0% |
| 32 | 2015 | 16/16 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 64.4% | 68.4% | 48.0% | 56.4% | 38.8% | 61.0% | 37.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 10/10 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 71.8% | 60.9% | 43.6% | 56.0% | 58.7% | 56.5% | 40.5% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 60.4% | 81.3% | 38.1% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 64.2% | 29.1% |
| 34 | 2017 | 31/31 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 61.3% | 65.2% | 49.6% | 55.6% | 46.2% | 59.0% | 37.2% | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 66.4% | 64.6% | 57.5% | 66.7% | 62.5% | 62.2% | 40.8% |
| 35 | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 65.0% | 64.3% | 46.9% | 47.6% | 33.3% | 58.5% | 28.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 56.6% | 53.3% | 46.2% | 36.5% | 30.5% | 50.1% | 37.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 307/314 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 64.3% | 65.9% | 48.5% | 54.1% | 42.3% | 59.6% | 38.1% | — | 7/7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 58.5% | 71.7% | 46.2% | 60.2% | 63.4% | 61.2% | 36.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Andre Ghem | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2003 | 1478 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 1465 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 1454 | 100.8 | -2.29 | -5.10 | 0.646 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 1428 | 113.9 | -5.99 | +0.03 | 0.831 | 46.6% | +61 | +41 | — | 30.6% | -1.06 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.6 | +0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1551 | 123.3 | -2.82 | -1.97 | 0.854 | 47.4% | -83 | +68 | -87 | 44.3% | -0.26 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–7 (42%) | 99.9 | +1.33 | 2006 | 1503 | 107.0 | -0.24 | -2.34 | 0.818 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.33 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1451 | 116.8 | -4.78 | -0.93 | 0.851 | 46.7% | -26 | +71 | — | 26.1% | -1.33 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.2 | -0.25 | 2007 | 1453 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1453 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 1542 | 116.3 | -1.42 | -0.42 | 0.848 | 46.7% | — | +85 | — | 42.9% | -0.93 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 1658 | 141.7 | -1.96 | +1.98 | 0.989 | 49.4% | -156 | +1 | -200 | 41.5% | -0.36 | 5–10 (33%) | 5–10 (33%) | 97.6 | -1.59 | 2010 | 1440 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 1657 | 148.5 | -2.64 | +2.36 | 1.001 | 50.1% | -91 | +97 | -221 | 45.1% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 7–8 (47%) | 103.8 | +1.93 | 2011 | 1486 | 109.4 | +1.73 | -3.32 | 0.656 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1827 | 157.9 | +0.16 | +1.05 | 1.028 | 50.1% | -69 | -10 | -393 | 50.0% | +0.15 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–10 (38%) | 99.6 | -1.20 | 2012 | 1481 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 1744 | 139.2 | -1.96 | +1.94 | 1.023 | 50.5% | -88 | +143 | -297 | 48.1% | -0.04 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | -0.42 | 2013 | 1535 | 110.4 | +0.14 | -0.12 | 1.203 | 54.4% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 32 | 2015 | 1693 | 139.3 | -0.88 | +1.29 | 0.973 | 49.9% | -34 | +75 | — | 46.7% | -0.53 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.5 | -0.65 | 2014 | 1544 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 1735 | 126.6 | -2.73 | +1.14 | 0.930 | 49.0% | — | +95 | — | 36.4% | -0.59 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.30 | 2015 | 1552 | 107.3 | -2.66 | -4.03 | 0.811 | 46.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1695 | 138.3 | -3.23 | +0.60 | 0.906 | 48.3% | -51 | +53 | -241 | 40.7% | -0.74 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 100.0 | -0.39 | 2016 | 1496 | 108.9 | -0.57 | -2.17 | 1.078 | 52.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.03 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1667 | 119.0 | -2.49 | -0.73 | 0.689 | 44.3% | — | +27 | — | 20.0% | -1.47 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.36 | 2017 | 1505 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 1505 | 105.1 | -3.42 | -0.56 | 0.757 | 43.8% | — | +57 | — | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1853 | 142.9 | -2.37 | +0.92 | 0.943 | 48.9% | -77 | +59 | -245 | 42.0% | -0.41 | 40–56 (42%) | 47–55 (46%) | 98.7 | -0.22 | — | 1593 | 109.5 | -0.24 | -2.06 | 0.945 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 35.3% | -0.35 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +3.29 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 23, 2014 | H2H |
| Santiago Giraldo | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 13, 2015 | H2H |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 5 | 1 | 6 | May 3, 2014 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renzo Olivo | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 21, 2016 | H2H |
| Victor Estrella | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 5, 2015 | — |
| Juan Monaco | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 23, 2013 | H2H |
| Go Soeda | 1 | 0 | 1 | May 22, 2013 | H2H |
| Carlos Berlocq | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 10, 2011 | H2H |